首页> 外文OA文献 >Developing an instrument to assess the endoscopic severity of ulcerative colitis: the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS).
【2h】

Developing an instrument to assess the endoscopic severity of ulcerative colitis: the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS).

机译:开发一种评估溃疡性结肠炎的内窥镜检查严重性的工具:溃疡性结肠炎内窥镜检查严重程度指数(UCEIS)。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: Variability in endoscopic assessment necessitates rigorous investigation of descriptors for scoring severity of ulcerative colitis (UC). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate variation in the overall endoscopic assessment of severity, the intra- and interindividual variation of descriptive terms and to create an Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity which could be validated. DESIGN: A two-phase study used a library of 670 video sigmoidoscopies from patients with Mayo Clinic scores 0-11, supplemented by 10 videos from five people without UC and five hospitalised patients with acute severe UC. In phase 1, each of 10 investigators viewed 16/24 videos to assess agreement on the Baron score with a central reader and agreed definitions of 10 endoscopic descriptors. In phase 2, each of 30 different investigators rated 25/60 different videos for the descriptors and assessed overall severity on a 0-100 visual analogue scale. κ Statistics tested inter- and intraobserver variability for each descriptor. A general linear mixed regression model based on logit link and β distribution of variance was used to predict overall endoscopic severity from descriptors. RESULTS: There was 76% agreement for 'severe', but 27% agreement for 'normal' appearances between phase I investigators and the central reader. In phase 2, weighted κ values ranged from 0.34 to 0.65 and 0.30 to 0.45 within and between observers for the 10 descriptors. The final model incorporated vascular pattern, (normal/patchy/complete obliteration) bleeding (none/mucosal/luminal mild/luminal moderate or severe), erosions and ulcers (none/erosions/superficial/deep), each with precise definitions, which explained 90% of the variance (pR(2), Akaike Information Criterion) in the overall assessment of endoscopic severity, predictions varying from 4 to 93 on a 100-point scale (from normal to worst endoscopic severity). CONCLUSION: The Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity accurately predicts overall assessment of endoscopic severity of UC. Validity and responsiveness need further testing before it can be applied as an outcome measure in clinical trials or clinical practice.
机译:背景:内窥镜评估的变异性要求对溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的严重程度评分指标进行严格的研究。目的:评估整体内镜评估严重性,描述性术语在个体内和个体间的差异,并建立可验证的溃疡性结肠炎内窥镜检查的严重程度指数。设计:一项为期两个阶段的研究使用了梅奥诊所得分为0-11的患者的670个视频sigmoidoscopies库,并补充了来自5个无UC患者和5例住院的重症UC患者的10个视频。在第1阶段,每10名研究者中的每人观看16/24录像带,以评估与中央阅读器对Baron评分的一致性,并商定10种内窥镜描述符的定义。在第2阶段,30位不同的研究人员中的每位都对描述符进行了25/60次不同的视频评分,并以0-100视觉模拟量表评估了总体严重性。 κ统计量检验了每个描述符在观察者之间和观察者内部的变异性。基于对数链接和方差的β分布的一般线性混合回归模型用于根据描述符预测整体内镜的严重性。结果:第一阶段研究者和中央阅读器之间“严重”的同意率为76%,但“正常”出现的同意率为27%。在阶段2中,在10个描述符的观察者之内和之间,加权κ值的范围为0.34至0.65和0.30至0.45。最终模型包括血管模式(正常/斑块/完全闭塞)出血(无/粘膜/管腔轻度/管腔中度或重度),糜烂和溃疡(无/糜烂/浅表/深部),每个都有精确的定义,这可以解释在内窥镜严重程度的总体评估中,有90%的方差(pR(2),Akaike信息准则),在100分制(从正常到最严重的内窥镜严重程度)上,预测范围从4到93不等。结论:溃疡性结肠炎内窥镜检查的严重程度指数可准确预测UC的内窥镜检查严重程度。有效性和响应性需要进一步测试,然后才能在临床试验或临床实践中用作结果指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号